Having a "checked by" attrib is hardly
giving all the credit to the
Nupedian. The complete article history will also be linked from the static,
checked version on Nupedia. And Wikipedia is the content development area -
We are not talking about a "checked by" for a stable version within Wikipedia,
we are talking about seperate articles (e.g. in the domain
www.nupedia.org)
that were taken out of the Wikipedia, copyedited and then placed under a new
label.
I agree that accuracy is the most important thing for an encyclopaedia.
However, Wikipedia is out there to prove that an encylopaedia (sic!) can be
build without a formalized process and without a formalized experts "editing
commitee". Do I understand it right, that you declare this attempt to be
failed right now?
Uli