tarquin <tarquin(a)planetunreal.com> writes:
Matt M. wrote:
How are they any different from the geographical
Wikipedian pages? I don't
see how asserting I'm Queer is any different from asserting I'm Canadian.
Sure.
But then why are users being prevented from asserting their opposition
to the US in its current state as a polluting warmonger ruled by an
oil baron despot?
Because of the "Anti". Enlisting as a queer user says nothing about your
attitude about non-queer people. Positive categories are fine (ecologists,
human right or peace activists, atheist, christian or muslim), negative
categories are evil: "anti-christian", "antisemite", because they
don't say
only something about the self-categorized person but also insult other
people.
I'm prepared to tolerate the "anti-" pages. If people want to paint
targets on their foreheads for everybody else to shoot at, I don't think
that the rest of us need to jump in to prevent their suicide. People
who choose to put their names on these lists need to know that being
there may say something to the rest of us about their credibility.
There can even be several pages that seem to say the same thing
(anti-american/anti-yankee or anti-gay/anti-queer/anti-pervert) with
each expressing a different perspective on the subject.
If some of the sillier debates can be marginalized to these personal
anti-pages, the more serious contributors are likely to ignore them
completely, no matter how offensive they get. Individual user pages
don't quite do the job for the people on these pages; they often need to
feel that they are a part of a group, even if it is a group of one.
Eclecticology