Jason Williams wrote:
Toby Bartels wrote:
>Every time it has appeared has been, in fact, a
case of vandalism.
>It's also presumably been a copyright infringement.
>We have standards against vandalism and copyright infringement,
>and we had them before goatse ever appeared.
So what you're saying is that if somebody created
an article [[goatse.cx]]
or somesuch, with an encyclopeadic writeup, and got permission from the
copyright owner, then that would be fine by you?
(Note that everything except the copyright permission is already on [[en:]].)
Yes, that would be fine by me, although I know that others would object.
If the group decided not to allow the now permitted and relevant image,
still that would require discussion; we don't have that standard now.
I'm not specifically raising any objection to that,
just trying to be
clear.
Clear?
-- Toby