EB is not an encyclopedia, it's a book where scholars write about the
stuff they know.
It has nothing to see with an encyclopedia as it was created by the
philosophers of the Enlightenement. That kind of compendium existed long
before and will continue to be useful... but it's not an encyclopedia !
Daniel Mayer wrote:
Before making fun of Wikipedia Robert McHenry and other
EB FUD writers should
compare our content to theirs.
For example, the 11th edition of Encyclopedia Britannica had *exactly* the same
error as our article had. EB should have had an article on Alexander Hamilton
for about 100 years by the time the 11th edition was published in 1911.
See
http://14.1911encyclopedia.org/H/HA/HAMILTON_ALEXA NDER.htm
Wikipedia is less than 4 years old.
More in my Slashdot post (somebody mod me up!):
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=129854&threshold=0&commentsort=…
-- mav
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l