Giskart wrote:
1. "draft" : a new articel starts whit the
draft-status. After 2
months and modification by at least 3 different members the articel
gets the "articel"-status automatic. This way you exclude nonsense.
2. "articel-status": a normal wikipedia articel. Free to edit by
everbody.
3. "stable-status": For a articel to get the "stable-status" there
must be a "vote-for-this-page". After the first vote for a articel
the software create a copy of the articel whit the status
"candidate-stable". This gets listed on a special page. . This stable
version can not be edit.
4. "Expert Approved"-status: approvel by a group of experts like on
Nupedia. Only those members can change the content of the
"expert-approved" articel.
That does not have my vote. There is some sense to the first two
levels, if only to bring to everybody's attention that an article is
new. Beyond that, multiple versions with different edit right seems
more chaotic than what we have now. And what is the general public to
make of this, when they only visit to read about a subject but find
multiple versions on the subject?
Eclecticology