On 01-09-2002, Giskart wrote thusly :
Daniel Mayer wrote:
Or we can simply revisit the idea of Beta/Stable;
whereby some type of
process validates an article. Having another level of validation through
Nupedia would also be a good thing. In that way Nupedia would be a
distribution of Wikipedia in the same way as Red Hat is a distribution of
Linus' Linux and the GNU tools.
What do you think of this:
You give to the articels a classification. You can hide or exclude
articels whit a specific classification in your preferences.
[classification snip]
Giskart
Some thoughts.
1. there's a potentially dangerous situation that :
a) we will never have enough experts
b) experts will go into lengthy disputes that will cause their number
to become 0
2. there should/could be another phase - a "scientifically valid" article
- properly _referenced_ and reflecting state-of-the-art in a given field
3. High brow and low brow - there's a huge gap between what is
scientifically valid and what is comprehensible to lay public
All in all, I have doubts that this plan will work. I think Wikipedia would
be better off with enthusiasts than with experts. Have we learnt anything from the Nupedia
vs Wikipedia lesson ?
Regards,
kpjas