Anthere wrote:
...
I want us to take decisions together, to work
deeply on that. Not to pretend working together,
to be allowed at the last step to be sessionnists.
...
I agree 100% with you Anthere! We had a Wikipedia-wide vote for a
Wikipedia-wide logo and we should stick with that (making improvements, of
course). We need one logo for Wikipedia for instant recognition - no matter
what language.
However, the idea of ratification does seem interesting, but in a different
way; if a certain percentage of Wikipedias do not ratify the logo, then it is
not adopted Wikipedia-wide and we are stuck with our old logos again and
probably a new logo contest (simple up or down votes on the concept with no
amendments or changes).
But a no vote would not mean that that Wikipedia version would be free to have
whatever logo it wants. However, I'm sure a super majority (75% of all
Wikipedia versions) will give the concept an up vote. That would mean that
the logo will be adopted Wikipedia-wide as soon as it is improved enough to
garner a majority yes vote.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)