This one of five pillars, how is it enforced, exactly?
Many a vocal "defender of faith" feels safe to put forward one's own
perception, oft mythologised, as a basis for contention of
"unconvenient" sources, no matter how fundamental.
I had this impression that sources are to be countered only by other
sources, not by somebody's own claims?
And if not countered, sources fall under the NPOV policy — all major
academic POV are to be represented, with balanced language?
---