Just what is a "reasonable" level of
quality?
That depends on the person and their purpose in looking up the information.
And, the quality of an end
result is very much tied to how it got there.
Of course, but does a "non-cultist" approach actually produce better
content than a "cultist" one? I suspect it's just a matter of making
the writers happier, which isn't a bad thing, but doesn't actually
help attract readers.