Good catch, Dan!
adding in the upfront option of indicating names or ids seems like a
good/needed addition. I would recommend also including the definition of
each as well - I think some of our users might get a little confused about
the delineation just from the names (i.e., not realize that user_names are
associated with user_ids).
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Dan Andreescu <dandreescu(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
So, for now, until I figure out how to fix this,
it will always prefer
user_names before user_ids.
I think this is an argument for making users specifying whether it's
names or ids up front, and not allowing mixtures. Assuming it might be a
mixture and looking for names first is almost certain to produce inaccurate
results at some point. We have ids precisely to avoid collisions with
names, allowing for renaming users, and other cases.
Yep, I just learned this the hard way and made a fool of myself in front
of a bunch of people I admire. So, I'd be glad if I'm the only one that
this happens to. If nobody objects, I'm going to allow the user to select
whether their cohort contains user_ids OR user_names, and strictly prohibit
mixtures.
_______________________________________________
Wikimetrics mailing list
Wikimetrics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
--
*Jessie WildGrantmaking Learning & Evaluation *
*Wikimedia Foundation*
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
Donate to Wikimedia <https://donate.wikimedia.org/>