No cronograma eu senti falta de menção ao planejamento estratégico entre julho de 2009 e julho de 2010, assim como o programa 'Devenvolvimento Global' (Global Development). https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chapters_Dialogue/Context#Strategy_wik… A falta de representação nos países do sul no movimento wikimedia, a resistência à *tentativa* brasileira um pouco diferente do que bem funciona em alguns países do norte (nem todos, como muitos sabemos), assim como certas trapalhadas da WMF e dos voluntários são muito importantes para esse diálogo (me refiro às trapalhadas que pude acompanhar, ou seja, mais no contexto brasileiro). Boas discussões e, principalmente, documentações no wiki. Tom 2014-08-03 21:32 GMT-03:00 Cornelius Kibelka &lt;cornelius.kibelka(a)wikimedia.de > Sinceramente, recomendo-vos não só uma olhada geral, mas mesmo lerem o > relatório. O mais cómodo é o arquivo pdf, e, se não tiverem tempo, o > resumo. Os que vão a Londres têm algumas horas livres no avião ;) > > O projecto abrange perguntas muito importante que não só tocam "os > capítulos" ou a Fundação, mas a todos que fazem do movimento Wikimédia. As > "perguntas fortes" (tough questions) todos nós temos que responder, ou pelo > menos tentar encontrar uma resposta. > > Se tiverem alguma dúvida, não hesitem em perguntar a Nicole (em inglês) ou > a mim (obviamente em português). > > Abraços, > Cornelius > (Aqui em nome de Wikimedia Alemanha) > Am 04.08.2014 00:42 schrieb "Rodrigo Padula" &lt;rodrigopadula(a)gmail.com> > Eu e o Jonas tivemos a oportunidade de conhecer a Kira durante a Iberoconf >> no México durante a etapa de levantamento de dados e entrevistas. >> >> Assistimos também a apresentação do resultado final do projeto em Berlim, >> foi muito bacana! >> >> Recomendo a todos darem uma olhada geral no material. >> >> Padula >> >> >> 2014-08-03 9:53 GMT-03:00 Everton Zanella Alvarenga &lt;tom(a)okfn.org.br>> >>> Boa iniciativa. >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Nicole Ebber &lt;nicole.ebber(a)wikimedia.de&gt; >>> Date: 2014-08-01 17:28 GMT-03:00 >>> Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Insights of the Chapters Dialogue are online! >>> To: Wikimedia Mailing List &lt;wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; >>> >>> >>> Dear Wikimedia friends, >>> >>> I am happy to announce that we have finally released the documentation >>> of the Chapters Dialogue project. >>> >>> You might probably remember: The Chapters Dialogue was the project >>> that was initiated by Wikimedia Deutschland in spring 2013, my former >>> colleague Kira Krämer interviewed representatives from Wikimedia >>> Chapters, the Wikimedia Foundation as well as Funds Dissemination and >>> Affiliations Committee. Kira and I presented the insights at several >>> occasions already, and now the written report is at your disposal. >>> >>> Please find all the information on the Meta page: >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Chapters_Dialogue >>> >>> For those of you who are already on their way into the weekend, to >>> London, or reading via mobile, I’m copying the Executive Summary of >>> the findings at the end of this email. >>> >>> Luckily, Wikimania is coming and I will be available to answer your >>> questions and reflect on ideas or concerns with anyone interested. >>> I’ll be in London from Tuesday till Monday, and will host a session on >>> the Chapters Dialogue insights on Saturday from 12:15 to 13:00 in room >>> Auditorium 1[1]. Attendees of this session will witness the premier of >>> the Chapters Dialogue movie, which will be released to the public >>> shortly after. If you cannot attend the session and don’t find me >>> hanging around at the Wikimedia Deutschland booth in the Community >>> Village, you can reach me via my user page[2] or via email. >>> >>> I would like to take this opportunity to again express my sincere >>> gratitude to everyone who participated, be it as one of the 94 >>> interviewees or one of our mentors, critical friend or supporter in >>> any other way. It’s been a blast! >>> >>> A very special and very warm thank you goes out to Kira. Together, we >>> rocked this last year and went through most exciting times. Kira is no >>> longer working for WMDE, but I promised to forward her every comment >>> and email that we receive from you. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Nicole >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/The_State_of_Wikimedia… >>> [2] >>> https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Nicole_Ebber_%28WMDE%29 >>> >>> >>> >>> Wikimedia Deutschland – Chapters Dialogue >>> Nicole Ebber (Project Lead), Kira Krämer (Project Manager) >>> >>> Executive Summary >>> Wikimedia is a global movement: the Wikimedia Foundation, the >>> Wikimedia Chapters and the international communities work and fight >>> for Free Knowledge. In spring 2013, Wikimedia Deutschland initiated a >>> structured assessment of the movement organisations’ needs, goals and >>> stories: the Chapters Dialogue. Nicole Ebber led the project and hired >>> Kira Krämer, who adapted the Design Thinking methodology to the >>> process. >>> >>> In the course of the project (August 2013-February 2014), 94 movement >>> representatives (volunteers and staff) from Chapters, the Wikimedia >>> Foundation as well as the Funds Dissemination Committee and the >>> Affiliations Committee were interviewed. >>> >>> The interviewees spoke about their understanding of roles and >>> relationships within the movement, of responsibilities that come with >>> being a Chapter or being the WMF. They described their goals and >>> stories, what support they need and who they think is in a position to >>> offer this support. >>> >>> The synthesis of all the interviews resulted in an overall picture of >>> the movement and a distillate of the most pressing issues. The >>> findings and insights cover these main areas, which have had a great >>> influence on the movement as it is today. >>> >>> Lack of empathy and the persistence of old narratives: All the >>> conflicts described in this report are based on causes that are deep >>> rooted and manifested in people’s perceptions about each other that >>> still persist today. Each party in the movement has its own needs and >>> tries to solve issues in its own interests, while lacking empathy for >>> other views, opinions, contexts and behaviour. >>> >>> Measuring success when exploring new territory: The movement lacks a >>> definition of what impact actually means to it, as all Wikimedia >>> activities can be described as exploring entirely new territory. >>> Chapters struggle with proving that they and their activities are >>> worth invested in while WMF has difficulty providing a clear movement >>> strategy. >>> >>> Organisational structures: Organisational structures have grown >>> organically without any official recommendation for or analysis of the >>> best organisational form to achieve impact. The lack of a shared >>> understanding about the Chapters’ role and contribution to the >>> movement causes severe insecurities and is fuelling conflicts and >>> misperceptions. >>> >>> Money-driven decisions: Creating a consensus about money, its >>> collection and responsible dissemination (donors’ trust!) is scarcely >>> possible. The Haifa trauma persistently blights the relationship >>> between WMF and the Chapters, fuelled by additional disagreement about >>> the new fundraising and grantmaking processes. >>> >>> The gap in leadership: Who should take the leadership role and what >>> should leadership in the Wikimedia movement look like? Adopting the >>> narrowed focus, the WMF clearly states that it does not see the >>> development of movement entities as their duty. Chapters on the other >>> hand expect the WMF to take a leading role in Chapters’ development, >>> while the WMF expects Chapters to be more proactive. >>> >>> None of these conflicts can be viewed in isolation, and no solution >>> can be developed without a thorough understanding and frank >>> conversations about the causes in the first place. We therefore >>> consider that it would be highly irresponsible to suggest solutions to >>> any of the described issues. Instead, we have distilled tough >>> questions from the insights that need to be addressed urgently and >>> answered in an open and comprehensive manner: >>> >>> 1. What do we as a movement want to achieve? Do we run a website or >>> foster free knowledge? Why are we doing the things we do, and what >>> for? >>> 2. How do we define impact when exploring new territory? And how do we >>> measure success? >>> 3. What is the role of the Wikimedia Foundation? >>> 4. How do we want to communicate with each other? How can we build the >>> necessary empathy and learn from each other? How can we overcome the >>> old narrative and perceptions? >>> 5. Where does the money come from and where should it go? Should money >>> be the limiting factor when striving for Free Knowledge? >>> 6. What movement framework is best suited to fulfil the Wikimedia >>> mission? >>> >>> The way things are at present inhibits the movement from striving >>> effectively for Free Knowledge. Instead of using its full potential to >>> further its mission, it revolves around itself. The common mission is >>> at serious risk if the movement does not tackle the causes of its >>> problems. >>> >>> These tough questions can only be approached in a structured and >>> professional way, with dedication and commitment. There is no point in >>> tinkering with the symptoms and finding single-problem solutions. >>> >>> The Chapters Dialogue concludes with the recommendation to build upon >>> the insights and to initiate a sequel: the design of a framework for >>> the Wikimedia movement in which it can work strongly and effectively >>> towards its mission in a professional way, yet stay true to its >>> grassroots and maintain its diversity. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines >>> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org >>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, >>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom) >>> Open Knowledge Brasil - Rede pelo Conhecimento Livre >>> http://br.okfn.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> WikimediaBR-l mailing list >>> WikimediaBR-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WikimediaBR-l mailing list >> WikimediaBR-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l >> >> > _______________________________________________ > WikimediaBR-l mailing list > WikimediaBR-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l > > -- Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom) Open Knowledge Brasil - Rede pelo Conhecimento Livre http://br.okfn.org