As a follow-up to the previous statement and discussion about
appropriate educational content, the board has passed a resolution
requesting a study of the issue of potentially objectionable content. We
have asked the Executive Director to organize this study and develop
recommendations for the board. We expect these will be shared with the
community and stimulate further discussion about whether to adopt
particular recommendations. Potential action would only follow that
process, but since it's hard to say what that might involve without
knowing the recommendations in advance, I will also pass along some
questions and answers that attempt to explain the process in more
detail. The text of the resolution follows:
1. The Wikimedia Foundation vision imagines a world in which every
single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That is
our commitment, and we aspire to see it realized.
2. We are making good progress towards that goal. Today, hundreds of
millions of people read the Wikimedia projects every month. Those people
represent a wide diversity of ethnicities, nationalities, ages,
socioeconomic conditions, sexual orientations, religions, values and
attitudes. We are proud of that, and we consider it proof of our
projects' broad relevance and utility.
3. In any group as diverse as ours, ideas about acceptability and taste
will necessarily vary widely. We know that to be true in our case
because, over the years, we have received many requests asking us to
remove from the projects different types of material, on the grounds
that it is objectionable to particular individuals or groups. However,
Wikimedia policy has never called for material to be deleted purely on
the basis that it is, or may be, objectionable, and our projects have
long contained caveats to that effect.
4. We do expect material in our projects to be educational in nature,
and any material that is not educational should be removed. We see our
role as making available all knowledge, not solely such knowledge as is
universally deemed acceptable. We believe that individual adults should
be able to decide for themselves what information they want to seek out.
In the case of children, we believe that their parents, teachers, and
other guardians are best placed to guide them to material that is
appropriate for them, based on their development and maturity, as they
grow into adulthood.
5. Nevertheless, we are concerned about the possibility of people being
exposed to objectionable material that they did not seek out. This may
include material that is violent, sexually explicit, or otherwise
disturbing; culturally offensive depictions; profane or vulgar language;
depictions of potentially dangerous activities; and exposure of children
to material that may be inappropriate for them. We believe that the
Wikimedia projects are a valuable educational resource, and we do not
want these issues to interfere in sharing knowledge with present or
future readers.
6. The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees believe that the Wikimedia
projects have a serious responsibility to carefully balance these
interests to the best of their ability. This includes considering the
interests of both adults and children, as well as understanding
different cultural perspectives about what material may be offensive. It
is a difficult challenge, and we do not take it lightly.
WE THEREFORE RESOLVE THAT:
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees hereby requests its Executive
Director to undertake a project studying this issue, and to develop a
set of recommendations for the Board. In this work, we ask that she
consult with a variety of stakeholders and experts, including Wikimedia
editors, other organizations which have grappled with the same or
similar issues, and thought leaders including relevant members of our
Advisory Board. We ask that she make an effort to include non-Western
perspectives. The purpose of this work is to develop recommendations to
enable the Wikimedia projects to appropriately and effectively serve all
audiences, including both adults and children, and including readers
both current and prospective.
The scope of this work should be broad, and might include recommended
changes to editorial policies, technical solutions, the development of
new projects that are appropriate for children, and so forth. In an
effort to allow sufficient time for thoughtful investigation, but also
to bring closure to this issue within a reasonable period, we ask the
Executive Director to deliver preliminary recommendations to the Board
at its fall meeting, and we encourage her to consult with the Board as
required in the intervening months.
--Michael Snow