On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
<amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> But, my
initial point was: Am I missing something? Would there be any
> reason why such grammar would have sense without ND clause?
Milos,
Could we not import these works onto Wikisource
in original format,
where they would be preserved without permitting altering from the
original? Wikisource community is a 'free-culture' equivalent of ND -
altering the original is considered to be vandalism.
This makes perfect sense to me.
But since Milos asked: In Wikisource changing the original is indeed
vandalism, but somebody must notice that it's vandalism. AFAIK Wikisource
doesn't have a proper way to authenticate that the document is in its
original form.
Could you elaborate on this? If you open the links in my email, you
will see that the text can be verified against the edition on file,
and Wikisource projects typically have *revision* patrolling enabled
to help catch incorrect changes.
--
John Vandenberg