That sounds more like an indictment of the organization of images, rather
than the images themselves.
DM
On 1/29/09, Jesse Plamondon-Willard <pathoschild(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:50 PM, David Moran <fordmadoxfraud(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
"Commons is meant to be a collection of
freely-licensed media, not a
dumping
ground for all media that happens to be
free."
What's the difference?
"Collection" implies some sort of useful organization and coherence,
with images added for their presumed usefulness. "Dumping ground"
implies a disorganized pile, with images added at random or without
regard to their presumed usefulness.
--
Yours cordially,
Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l