Erik Moeller wrote:
On 6/8/06, Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)wikia.com>
wrote:
I will never allow you to use the Wikimedia
Foundation name to raise
money for a project with no written proposal, no budget, no
professionalism, just "trust us, it's a cool idea".
I wrote specifications, a budget and a full proposal for Kennisnet in
February.
We have never seen a detailed budget (though we asked).
This proposal named the developers, the roles and
responsibilities, and the duration of development.
We have not received a timeline (despite repeated requests)
The proposal, as
...
I can not read .odt...
(shame...)
I suddenly wonder if we got all the right documents...
I suspect not...
Kennisnet was ready to approve the project as such if
Wikimedia was
happy with it.
... if Wikimedia was happy with it...
I believe SP has received the same document. Let me know
if that is not the case.
Errrr, can you make a pdf ?
Thanks
ant
Since then, the only major thing that has happened
from my point of
view is that I answered to some questions that came from SP (via
Legal). For the most part, there was nothing in there that could not
have been worked out as the project moves along -- see my response
from April:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/spcommittee-l/2006-April/000078.html
Erik