Well, either way, there's no harm in asking him to upload ones without the
watermark.
- Chris
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Hoi,
As far as I know, Commons has no such thing on watermarking. As always,
come
up with better illustrations and you can replace them. This is an
extraordinary situation anyway... Wikipedia has also this other "rule;
Ignore all rules.. A good one to apply for now.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/1/29 Chris Down <neuro.wikipedia(a)googlemail.com>
As a note, the images are watermarked, and I have
notified the user. IUP
states that this should not occur.
- Chris
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com
wrote:
2009/1/28 Andrew Whitworth
<wknight8111(a)gmail.com>om>:
Wikipedia would have to write some kind of
special exception to every rule to allow this book to exist there.
We already have the only exception we need: IAR. (That doesn't means
Wikibooks wouldn't handle it better, though!)
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l