On 2 March 2014 16:56, Mark <delirium(a)hackish.org> wrote:
On 3/2/14, 5:31 PM, Chris McKenna wrote:
> There is a further disconnect in that Commons is
taking an increasingly
> ultra-conservative approach to the definition of "Free", whereas most
other
> projects are working to a definition of "Free for all practical purposes".
> It is the latter interpretation that the board, in consultation with the
> legal team, are recommending as the way forward but is being resisted
> strongly by many on Commons.
This is more the crux of the issue, I think. I'm
mostly familiar with
en.wiki, but on there the definition swings pretty far to the opposite
extreme, with a lot of content that is *not* Free for most practical
purposes.
This discussion is not even about en:wp or its content; you are
derailing the discussion.
- d.