On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Pharos <pharosofalexandria(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Jesse Martin
(Pathoschild)
<pathoschild(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Pharos <pharosofalexandria(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
As long as there is
a notable -contemporary- literature, vocabulary problems will be
minimal.
What is "notable"?
Notable enough to have a Featured Article about [[Modern Latin
literature]] or [[Modern Coptic literature]] on English Wikipedia or
another major-language Wikipedia.
I think this proposed criteria is too subjective and naive. Specially
regarding to the fact English Wikipedia is not always good at
humanities, in particular non European literatures. Having a FA may
too be occasionally I'm afraid.
But I like the idea of "notable authors". They are notable since they
have a decent size of readership. It means their writings are read and
surrounded by the reader community which the language in question is
actively, at least, read and have a possibility to be written again.
And even if we still use Wikipedia again, "having an article of that
author" is a less opportunity driven criteria, I think.
--
KIZU Naoko
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
Quote of the Day (English):
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD