Brad,
One very easy solution to all of this is to segregate the live edited
wikipedia site from the published site scraped by the
search engines.
In other words, setup the community server "anyone can edit" at
something like
draften.wikipedia.org and publish reviewed
dumps of the community server to a read only external server for
scraping like I am doing at Wikigadugi. I have ZERO
vandalism problems , ZERO content dispute problems, and ZERO vanity page
problems and I host the entire English
wikipedia as well as several other languages.
Very simple solution. People won't waste the time creating vanity pages
when they know they may not get published in the
"official" external official site.
Jeff
Brad Patrick wrote:
Brad Patrick wrote:
Dear Community:
The volume of corporate vanity/vandalism which is showing up on
Wikipedia is overwhelming. At the office, we are receiving dozens of
phone calls *per week* about company, organization, and marketing
edits which are reverted, causing the non-notable, but
self-aggrandizing authors, to scream bloody murder. This is as it
should be. However, I am issuing a call to arms to the community to
act in a much more draconian fashion in response to corporate
self-editing and vanity page creation. This is simply out of hand,
and we need your help.
We are the #14 website in the world. We are a big target. If we are
to remain true to our encyclopedic mission, this kind of nonsense
cannot be tolerated. This means the administrators and new page
patrol need to be clear when they see new usernames and page creation
which are blatantly commercial - shoot on sight. There should be no
question that someone who claims to have a "famous movie studio" and
has exactly 2 Google hits - both their Myspace page - they get nuked.
Ban users who promulgate such garbage for a significant period of
time. They need to be encouraged to avoid the temptation to recreate
their article, thereby raising the level of damage and wasted time
they incur.
Some of you might think regular policy and VfD is the way to go. I am
here to tell you it is not enough. We are losing the battle for
encyclopedic content in favor of people intent on hijacking Wikipedia
for their own memes. This scourge is a serious waste of time and
energy. We must put a stop to this now.
Thank you for your help.
-Brad Patrick
User:BradPatrick
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l