My apology for misunderstanding the question. I agree with you about
the tagline.
Ec
- Essjay - wrote:
I believe that the issue of concern has been confused:
We're not worried
about the articles, we're worried about the slogans that are used on the
various main pages. Either Wikipedia is "the free encyclopedia" or it is
not; it's not the place of Wikiquote to decide on a new tagline, any more
than it is appropriate for Wikiquote to change the Wikipedia logo to another
one. By the same token, it is not the place of Wikipedia to decide if
Wikisource is "the free library" or not; whatever is the official slogan of
Wikisource is what needs to be put in the little box on the main page that
links to all the other projects.
Essjay
On 3/24/06, Birgitte Arco <birgitte_sb(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>Thus the article about Wikisource in Wikipedia
>>should follow Wikipedia
>>rules about articles in its principal namespace. In
>>that context
>>Wikisource is no different than someone whose
>>biography appears in
>>Wikipedia.
>>
>Just to be clear here. This is not about sister
>project articles but rather the ~3-6 words that
>accompany the logos at the bottom of the Main Page and
>various other community pages.
>
>I agree Wikipedia articles about sister projects in
>the article namespace should follow normal rules for
>any such article.
>
>