How is it that you can be so certain that out of 690,000 articles,
that none of them have been bot-generated? Are you positive? Have you
seen all 690,000?
The declaration that de.wikipedia has absolutely 0 bot-generated
articles, or 0 articles that were originally bot-generated and have
since been human-edited seems overly pretentious to me. A better
display of good faith would be for you to assume that possibility that
at some point a bot has created an article on de.wp. It's certainly
not an unreasonable assumption by any stretch.
--Andrew Whitworth
On Jan 1, 2008 11:54 AM, Daniel Arnold <arnomane(a)gmx.de> wrote:
Am Montag, 31. Dezember 2007 22:25:26 schrieb
iloveplankton:
Wow, you've sure got a lot of bent up angry
going on, don't you? I'm
sure it was simple mistake, there is no need to call somebody a liar.
I wouldn't have been so angry if this were the first time. Actually several
people pointed out this fact on this very list even in this thread.
So if someone still just says that de.wikipedia has bot generated articles
cause he can't imagine that nearly 690'000 articles can be created otherwise
he acted in bad faith or at least should read first and then write but not
the other way round.
Arnomane
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l