On 2 March 2014 02:01, Mark
<delirium(a)hackish.org> wrote:
I personally would welcome more attention to our
actual mission,
producing
free content, rather than the mission some of our
members seem to be
engaged
in, "making the *.wikipedia.org sites look
nice in the short term, even
if
nobody external can reuse the content".
You're seriously characterising the present dispute as this?
Its a pretty accurate description. What do you think the law says?
--
geni