Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
> > [...]
> > The WMF as a membership organisation would be great, but I don't think
> > it is practical. A better option (which I have discussed with a few
> > poeple) would be having the chapters as members of the WMF and the
> > community as members of the chapters. There are other global
> > non-profits that work along those lines. (The International Federation
> > of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, for example.)
> Why? What's broken at the moment?
The English full-history dump, for one.
And that would work if the WMF were a membership organiza-
tion? Interesting.
Tim