On 29/09/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/29/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes. The problem is *not* one susceptible to a
new rule, because the
> problem is not the failure of present rules. The problem is keeping up
> with the firehose of crap and not risking doing something really
> stupid. Brad, this needs more thought than just adding another rule.
Make it impossible to create orphan articles.
"Sorry, you can't have your article unless you apply *this* magic
trick we mention on a page you didn't read, did you."
Bites the newbies badly, and doesn't stop editors of bad faith for a
second. Rules can't cure malice.
- d.