On 24/03/2008, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You mean, hold a copyright via pseudonym or other
agency and enforce it
in the same manner until otherwise impossible, or completely anonymously?
The first, of course, we do on Wikipedia every day. The issue with this
seems to be
no assertion of copyright or traceability to discover if its owed,
rather than an anonymously asserted claim.
Anonymously, not pseudonymously. If it's just pseudonymous, you can
plausibly prove that it's your pseudonym (might be difficult, but not
impossible). If it's completely anonymous, there's no way you can
prove it's yours.
It doesn't really matter if it's anonymous by intent or not, either
way you can't prove it's yours.