On 30/10/05, Daniel Mayer <maveric149(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Dan Grey <dangrey(a)gmail.com> wrote:
All I see is a company offering to host
pre-configured MediaWiki
installations for customers under the terms of the GPL. Where's the
problem?
Use of the term 'Media Wiki' as if it were their product or service. It is not.
It was crystal clear to me the very first time I read it that the
company are just offering MediaWiki installs in their hosting plans,
which afaik they're perfectly entitled to do.
This is a fuss over nothing - if anything, we should be congratulating them!
Dan