Hi,
About copyright , the articles do not contain "G12. Unambiguous copyright
infringement.", I can only trust the category system from wikipedia is
working. I am willing to help fine tune the speedy deletion system to be
specific about what articles are original copyrighted material.
there is more work to do on attribution, the dumps on
does
contain an attribution of wikipedia in general and the creative commones
license for the entire bucket,
The individual users names are only visible in the data files, I assume we
could collect them..
For the wikia, at this point I am using the standard wikia template
, so the
articles should have a text like this and the name of the last author :
[image: Smallwikipedialogo.png] This page uses content that was added to *
Wikipedia* <http://en.wikipedia.org/>. The article has been deleted from
Wikipedia. The original article was written by these Wikipedia users:
Ammodramus.
As with this wiki (Speedy deletion Wiki), the text of Wikipedia is
available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>.
Again the full history is available on
and i think that no one
is going to think that this data is from me, it is clearly marked as being
from wikipedia.
mike
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Risker <risker.wp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
How are you attributing the work and ensuring that the
license conditions
are met?
Risker
On 11 June 2012 01:24, Mike Dupont <jamesmikedupont(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
good question,
The raw data is not lost : the
archive.org will get a snapshot every 30
minutes of the items that are categorized.
the wikia right now will not be updated: There is not any code for the
updating of the article, once it is in the wikia.
I would be interesting to get the full history of each article, if it is
replaced after deletion, i suppose that a new page or subpage would be
needed if it is deleted again, maybe a fine history would be good enough.
In any case if articles last more than 30 minutes in the speedy deletion
category they will be archived.
mike
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What happens to your system if an article is
deleted from Wikipedia, a
new
> article is posted again under the same name, and then that one is also
> deleted?
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Mike Dupont <
> jamesmikedupont(a)googlemail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Kirill Lokshin <
> kirill.lokshin(a)gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > This is where I think things become slightly problematic. There
are,
> in
> > > broad terms, two categories of hoaxes: those which are
fundamentally
> > > harmless (these typically being of
the "did you know that
'gullible'
> > isn't
> > > in the dictionary" variety), and those which have the potential to
be
> > > harmful (including, but not
limited to, false statements about
drugs,
> crimes, politically explosive issues, etc.). The
speedy deletion
system
> > makes no real attempt to distinguish between these (with the
exception
> of
> > > blatant attacks on living people, which have their own deletion
tag),
> but
> > > retaining the second category in a publicly-viewable (and
> > > publicly-searcheable?) form is probably not desirable.
> > >
> > >
> > I am willing to delete articles from the wikia, they are also
archived
on
> >
archive.org.
> > it would be nice to work out a detailed tagging system to work out
what
may
> be archived and what not.
> We can remove categories and add them.
>
> But lets look at some of these,
>
http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Ipod_5.5_generation this looks
like
> someone who is providing infomation in the
wrong way, but could be
valid.
> >
http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Trantlers this is funny and
would
> > like
> > to keep it and add a picture of it, maybe to a humor section. this
one
this
is
> also unencylopedia material.
>
> now this looks like a hoax , and could be deleted, but also
unencylopedia
> > stuff.
> >
http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Aman_hadid
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > personally I am interested in non notable articles, my experience
with
>
dealing with encouraging editors and collection creative commons
licensed
information
on places that are not very notable like villages in kosovo could be
helped
> with these articles.
> if we can find authors who are willing to write about non notable
topics,
> maybe we can collect them and categorize
them.
> this could be a recruiting mechanism and also provide good basic data
and
> maybe new contributors for wikitravel and
openstreetmap.
> with a staging system like this speedydeletion wikia you will have a
way
to
> demote articles to the speedy deletion purgatory where they might
redeem
> > themselves.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova
http://flossk.org
Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world
http://fosm.org
Mozilla Rep
https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l