I was on Commons and stumbled across a photograph of a man cumming onto a
cracker and then eating it. Turns out this is called a "soggy biscuit." You
learn something new everyday.
In the heat of annoyance about "WP:NOTCENSORED" cries, I decided to add the
image of the guy eating his cum drenched biscuit on the [[Soggy biscuit]]
article.
Well it was quickly taken down!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Soggy_biscuit#Removing_the_article_image
But at least we have plenty of other images of people in sexually deviant
situations with their faces shown. :P
-Sarah "You can't always get what you want," Stierch
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
--- On Fri, 30/9/11, Ryan Kaldari
<rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
From: Ryan Kaldari <rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Blog from Sue about censorship, editorial
judgement, and image filters
To: foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Friday, 30 September, 2011, 0:28
On 9/28/11 11:30 PM, David Gerard wrote:
This post appears mostly to be the tone
argument:
http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Tone_argument
- rather than address those opposed to the WMF (the body perceived to
be abusing its power), Sue frames their arguments as badly-formed and
that they should therefore be ignored.
Well, when every thoughtful comment you have on a topic is met with
nothing more than chants of "WP:NOTCENSORED!", the tone argument seems
quite valid.
Ryan Kaldari
Quite.
I have had editors tell me that if there were a freely licensed video of a
rape (perhaps a historical one, say), then we would be duty-bound to include
it in the article on [[rape]], because Wikipedia is not censored.
That if we have a freely licensed video showing a person defecating, it
should be included in the article on [[defecation]], because Wikipedia is
not censored.
That if any of the Iraqi beheading videos are CC-licensed, NOTCENSORED
requires us to embed them in the biographies of those who were recently
beheaded.
That if we have five images of naked women in a bondage article, and none
of men having the same bondage technique applied to them, still all the
images of naked women have to be kept, because Wikipedia is not censored.
And so on.
Andreas
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia <http://www.glamwiki.org>
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Art<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch>
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.*
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sarahstierch.com/