<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Affiliates_Network#Mailing_list_request_for_comment>
I suggest building on that rather than starting a whole new one.
-greg
On Oct 19, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Keegan Peterzell
<keegan.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Gregory Varnum <gregory.varnum(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Chris - and I suspect others - who are already
welcome to join this list -
are why I think it is not a foregone conclusion that it will be kept
private.
Remember that we have a diverse group of 80+ affiliates. It may in fact
not be that the will of the ones who requested it represents the will of
everyone. However, I am not personally comfortably declaring that on their
behalf. I would prefer to allow them to discuss it and go from there.
-greg
I feel it's now time for the obligatory "Please discuss this on meta if we
want to talk about transparency" post.
<
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_movement_affiliates/Affiliat…
--
~Keegan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan
This is my personal email address. Everything sent from this email address
is in a personal capacity.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>