Hoi,
People from Moldovan and Romania are partisan to this conflict. From a
language point of view the political arguments are irrelevant. It is wrong
to insist that this is vote is acceptable. It is also wrong to eventually
say there is a consensus.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Nov 10, 2007 2:18 PM, Johannes Rohr <jorohr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
GerardM <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
writes:
As such I do not agree with the proposal but the
analogy is
strong. There is a war going on and one expression of a language is
prohibited by law by one of the parties and we fail to appreciate it
as such.
Do you refer to Moldova's banning of Cyrillic or Transnistrias
oppression of Roman?
However, I fail to see how external political decisions should decide
over the fate of the mo.wiki.
I feel that this decision should be up to the community of native
speakers. And this community, as the discussion has shown,
unanimously opposes the existance of a separate mo.wiki.
Thanks,
Johannes
--
http://www.infoe.de/
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l