On 26/09/06, James Hardy <wikimediauk(a)weeb.biz>
wrote:
Uploading the original PDFs to a publicly
accessable website would most
likely be a copyright violation, so we wouldn't want to do that anyway.
In the UK, not in the US.
Another question is what to do about about
diagrams (assuming that there are
some), I would imagine that if the the RS claims copyright of the scans we
can't just extract them and use them. Simple ones I imagine we can (and
probably should) convert to SVG, but for more detailed ones, that could be
tricky.
So no-one in the UK should do this, but someone in the US may say "you
claim you own a scan of a diagram from 1720 and no-one else can touch
it? O rly. Sue and be damned." This is something we would need to be
*quite* clear that we were or were not going to say ahead of time, of
course.
(Though put like that, it looks very like the National Portrait
Gallery issue. Have they ceased the vague attempts at legal
intimidation after Jimbo indicated Wikimedia's attitude would in fact
be "sue and be damned"?)
cc: to foundation-l on this issue.
According to my experience as a scientist writing sometimes a review
articles you have to '''always''' ask for permission to use
graphs
which are copyrighted or included in a copyrighted publications or
databases. However, the source scientific data which was used for
preparing graph is not a subject of the copyright law, so you can
simply draw a new graph using the data from the original one and put
the citations of a source.
--
Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz