On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:27 PM, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 21 July 2012 22:33, Mike Dupont
<jamesmikedupont(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
John, and others.
I have finally figured out a big problem with my plan. The articles for
deletion are not tagged peoperly at all. There are authors who know for a
fact that articles are mistagged and have no proper copyvio tagging, and
now they are accusing me of hosting copyvio articles. I see this a
problem
in the wikipedia deletion system, if an editor
knows for a fact that an
articles is in violation of copyright then they should tag it as Such. I
have written scripts to strip out artilces that are properly tagged. Lets
sit down and work out a plan for a proper system of sorting out what is
not
notable, and waht is copyrightvio.
Not going to happen. The reality is that people deleting articles are
going to opt for the option that takes the least effort on their part.
And A7 beats out G12 in that case.
Ok, well i understand that people dont want extra work, but I think we can
work on some process and software. It might happend.
The other issue is that OTRS, who's
opinions we care about a lot more, complain when people go the other
way (deleting things as copyvios rather than going through AFD).
Is there any way to tag them like that? can we mark them?
--
geni
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova
http://flossk.org
<http://flossk.org>Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion
http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world
http://fosm.org
Mozilla Rep
https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3