On Jun 7, 2004, at 2:49 AM, Delirium wrote:
Jimmy Wales wrote:
I fully support that we should accept images
under all free licenses,
using the aggregation clause of the GNU FDL. (Clause 7.)
This requires defining a free license, however:
-- Does requiring attribution (like old-style BSD) make the license
non-free? Richard Stallman seems to think so, from what I can gather
from
gnu.org.
Don't the GFDL and GNU GPL require attribution?
-- Does permitting only verbatim redistribution make
the license
non-free? Many people (including myself) would argue so.
I would say so.
Peter
-- ---<>--- --
A house without walls cannot fall.
Help build the world's largest encyclopedia at
Wikipedia.org
-- ---<>--- --