:
(jenotem) Menotey [jöläts 0] > blanked by 87.97.23.48.pool.invitel.hu ,
wich has undid by my dinamic IP adrss
(jenotem) Mirnav [jöläts 16] > striked and deleted
(jenotem) Nünots Volapükaklub Linz-Urfahr [jöläts 101]
(jenotem) Timabled Volapükik [jöläts 102]
(jenotem) Yelabuk Volapükakluba valemik Nedänik [jöläts 102]
(jenotem) Volapükakongred di Friedrichshafen [jöläts 104]
(jenotem) Yelanunod Volapükaklub in Leitmeritz [jöläts 104]
^ all with one phase and one category. Read
again.
On Dec 28, 2007 3:15 PM, Daniel Arnold <arnomane(a)gmx.de> wrote:
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2007 16:42:20 schrieb Luiz
Augusto:
[...]
Look the timestamp... I really love the worry that de.wikipedia (and
de.projects in general) have to quality. It is great to have. But on de
projects. Please avoid [[Cultural dissonance]]. Your community thinks
something, others communities not necessarily share it.
Well I can "reveal" even more. I noticed this whole matter in a personal
meeting of Wikipedians from Nuremberg in Ansbach on 21. December
(
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:N
ürnberg/Berichte#21._Dezember_2007).
Among other topics we which interwikis are an advantage to our
multilingual
readers (look at the article [[Sun]] it is a challenge to find the
interwikis
in the languages you are interested in).
Thus we naturally discussed about Volapük Wikipedias "articles" and their
resulting interwikis and our past efforts to solve he issue *together*
with
vo.wikipedians. One of our finding was that vo.wikipedians even consider
masses of articles *without a single sentence* as articles and properly
proposing some of those articles for deletion as vandalism (just today
Smeira
said in one case a little sorry combined with a further demand to follow
some
strange rules).
On independence of Wikipedia communities:
* A Wikipedia that generates interwikis to such contentless articles en
masse
destroys one of our common strengths: Our cool interwiki system.
* Furthermore they challenge the reputation of the whole international
Wikipedia community to outsiders.
* And above all. There are some unchangeable rules in every Wikipedia
imposed
by the Wikimedia Foundation. One of them is NPOV and vo.wikipedia in its
current stage simply has no chance to get somewhere near NPOV because of
their methods choosen.
So we all Wikipedias have mutal responsibility. If a Wikipedia is denies
any
responsibility for others and ignores (even temporarily) some unchangeable
rules this community has to face the fact that they loose their
independence
until they are on common ground again.
I would never impose de.wikipedia's "rules" on others (heck even I do not
agree with some of these "rules", see
http://arnomane.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/relevanz-ist-irrelevant/), just
the
common ground with a differentiated request (keeping all non-minor
articles
of Volapük and moving it to the Incubator).
Arnomane
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l