On 1/31/07, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Which I should note includes removal of caption
text which obviously is
not
covered by any image license. It's certainly
true that in most cases the
caption is meaningless without the image sometimes the caption text is
significant to the article on its own.
I believe that removal should be done manually.
Really? Cool.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Works_of_the_Philippines_government
Needs sorting out (deleting). Some of the stuff there could probably
be tagged fair use but the rest needs to be orphaned.
Before you do that would you mind orphaning:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Indusvalleyexcavation.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sistine.chapel.entire.500pix.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:LowerFortGarry.jpg
Because that would allow us to clean out Category: Non-commercial use
only images once and for all.
I'm not interested in doing that. I'm not an image licensing zealot.