I am sorry if I am misunderstanding something, but reading the
Google-translated versions of the quoted e-mails, they seem to all come
from Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton, so in solving any misunderstanding his
opinions should be heard, and to make this discussion more constructive,
maybe we could leave the character of Tomas out of it, if he isn't the one
with whom some members of WM Brasil have a misunderstanding.
--
Bence Damokos
For those who have lost the first mails in this discussion, from Porantis'
e-mail dated Nov 24, 2008 at 2:30 AM:
[2]
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
2008/11/25 BĂ©ria Lima <berialima(a)gmail.com>om>:
Geoffrey...
The guy whit you are talking is one of the best sysops on pt.wikipedia.
Don't be maniqueist please.
The case is: Thomas is a good guy... but in the mailing list he stopped
all
the process of consensus. The problem is not just
a discussion of
Porantim
and Thomas... are more of 10 wikipedist that
agree whit Porantim, me and
Luiz Augusto. Don't ut that in terms of "dispurtive", "vandal" or
anything
about that...
We are discuss the bylaws again... because that mensage of Luiz. Before
that
Thomas and another user don't permit the
dialog.
How about some (translated) quotes so we can see what was really going
on? Text can be a very inaccurate way of conveying ones point, perhaps
Thomas was just misunderstood? Judging by Jimbo's assessment of the
guy and your assessment of the situation, it seems the most likely
explanation is that there has been a misunderstanding somewhere.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l