hi,
let me clarify - asking WMDE was an independent decision of the FDC, and
not of the FDC staff. The FDC reached out to WMDE regarding this request,
and the FDC staff has assisted us since then. The sentence is thus true,
although may sound misleading.
best,
dj "pundit"
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Risker <risker.wp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you Winifred. These appear to be very good, and
I largely agree with
the assessment.
I know that the WMF FDC staff did not review the WMF submission; it was
partially reviewed by WMDE. In the first sentence of the introduction to
their report they say "In order to avoid a potential bias assessing their
own proposal, WMF/FDC staff have asked Wikimedia Deutschland (WMDE) to do
the staff assessment of the WMF's proposal."[1] This is not consistent with
what the FDC chair and members told us in the thread on Wikimedia-L. Did
the WMF/FDC staff request that WMDE do the assessment?
Risker/Anne
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Proposals/2013-2014_round2/Wikim…
.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
__________________________
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
profesor zarządzania
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego
i centrum badawczego CROW
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
http://www.crow.alk.edu.pl
członek Akademii Młodych Uczonych Polskiej Akademii Nauk