Thanks for your information but it doesn't sound an "interwiki" thing
at all. It sounds rather trwiki internal issue and that's all.
And I would add using stewards as deus ex machina to judge community
issues is a horrible idea, at least for me. Trwiki, in this case,
would be better to settle their own arbcom; again it doesn't look like
"interwiki" things.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 20:13:26 Ray Saintonge wrote:
For
example checkuser info on indef blocked user should be shared among
checkusers. If user 'A' is banned on wiki 'X' and then decides to
register the account 'B' on the wiki 'Y' the local community should be
prepared for it.
I have no use for this kind of infectious paranoia.
This is our reality. I already have one example: a person with the account A
was on tr and az wps. They were banned at tr some time ago, then, after some
time at az wp, while having the account B at tr.wp. With somewhat more
effective CU organization, account B would be banned at tr.wp at the time
when the account A was banned at az.wp. However, account B was in the process
of getting admin permissions at tr.wp. And the process of blocking it was
very painful for tr.wp community. Instead of having a regular method for
dealing with such kind of problems, they needed deux ex machina, some steward
who will do one IAR for them.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
KIZU Naoko
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
Quote of the Day (English):
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD