On 12/31/06, David Strauss <david(a)fourkitchens.com> wrote:
The Cunctator wrote:
You should tag the article
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising)
then. I didn't realize there was anything disputed.
Your wisecracks aren't productively furthering this discussion. It's
your interpretation that's disputed, not the article.
I was quite serious; not making any wisecracks.
You had written:
Your response is built on your disputed notion of advertising.
Okay, what notion are you referring to, and what's the dispute?