I don't see how this can be avoided, if we want the
sort of high quality bids we saw for 2007. The only
reason people pushed so hard for such great results
was because they knew they were in competition and had
a chance of losing. If we focus on minimizing the
amount of wasted effort then we will end up minmizing
the quality of the bids.
I don't see any reason to scrap the system which
brought us the Turin and Tapei bids without any better
alternative.
Birgitte SB
--- David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 28/09/06, effe iets anders
<effeietsanders(a)gmail.com> wrote:
But if you want another procedure, make one,
and don't skip the procedure and just choose one.
Because next year
you will then have an even huger problem, as
there
will be no bidding
candidates which are somehow experienced, and you
will have a lot of
cities bidding which don't have to be good.
I don't have to have a replacement to be able to
notice that the
current one is clearly damaging. Sending some of the
Foundation's
hardest-working volunteers on a futile task is
utterly demotivating.
- d.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)wikimedia.org
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around