Hoi,
Having a criterion that is dependent on the English language Wikipedia is
not and cannot be seriously considered as a standard. What it considers note
worthy is not necessarily relevant from a linguistic or otherwise point of
view.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Pharos <pharosofalexandria(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Jesse Martin
(Pathoschild)
<pathoschild(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Pharos <pharosofalexandria(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
What is
"notable"?
Notable enough to have a Featured Article about [[Modern Latin
literature]] or [[Modern Coptic literature]] on English Wikipedia or
another major-language Wikipedia.
English should not have a wiki? I don't think it's a very good
criteria if even our most prolific non-extinct language doesn't
qualify.
I'm proposing a standard for languages that don't have native
speakers, which must be judged solely on the output of their written
literatures.
This would not restrict Wikipedias for languages with native speakers.
(Obviously [[Modern English literature]] is notable enough a subject
to be FA-worthy anyway, and it would hardly need to be demonstrated)
Thanks,
Pharos
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l