z(a)mzmcbride.com wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
Our current markup is one of our biggest barriers
to participation.
[snip]
* Tim doesn't scale. Most of our other technical people don't scale.
*We have no resources and still run on almost nothing*.
($14m might sound like enough money to run a popular website, but for
comparison, I work as a sysadmin at a tiny, tiny publishing company
with more money and staff just in our department than that to do
*almost nothing* compared to what WMF achieves. WMF is an INCREDIBLY
efficient organisation.)
In comparison $14m does seem highly profligate. Our R&D budget was £10m
(approx $16) in 2009, spent almost entirely on software development, and we
have over 160 software engineers working on our products. Remind me just how
many full time developers does WMF have?