Something like this could be nice, but there are several issues:
1. Is the software behind it still maintained? I heard at some point that
Mozilla is retiring it. But maybe that website already runs a new version.
2. We'll have to see whether there are volunteers who are willing to track
it and reply to the queries.
3. There is a similar - though not identical - tool in the MediaWiki
universe - ArticleFeedback. It's acceptance is quite slow.
Somebody has to take responsibility for resolving these issues.
Don't take that as stop energy, please; I do think that better user
feedback tools would be great.
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2013/11/22 Gryllida <gryllida(a)fastmail.fm>
Hi all.
Would Wikimedia like to have anything similar to
https://input.mozilla.org/ (it runs on an open-source platform)? I see
this as a useful and transparent (!) channel for feedback; useful to see
what majority of users actually have issues with. While most WMF projects
have a village pump, a talk page, mailing lists, they're sort of to solve
issues on the spot without leaving a trace. This one leaves output: a
pattern of what users are displeased with. Output classifiable by language,
by project, by time. Similarly what they're pleased with, likewise.
Gryllida.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>