Hoi,
Well actullly I do not know you well enough and as has been said in this
thread before, *many* people make the same mistake and do not think consider
it relevant.
As to the politics of all this, you gave the impression that you have
jurisdiction on the #wikipedia-*** channels. What I now think you are saying
is that as the #wikipedia is the "mother of all" wikipedia channels there is
a need for some coordination. It has been sufficiently argued that this was
a shambles and you going on a holiday at the moment when this happened made
it seem to be only more arbitrary. Then yes, I know how these things go...
things creep up on you.
TThanks,
GerardM
On 7/31/07, Mark Ryan <ultrablue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 31/07/07, GerardM <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Mark,
There are Wikimedia affiliated IRC channels on Freenode.
Thanks for getting even the basics wrong.
Thanks,
GerardM
This seems to be a bit nitpicky. I meant to say Wikipedia, and did.
I'm sure you know me well enough to realise I know the difference
between Wikipedia and Wikimedia.
I invited people from all Wikipedia (yes, pedia) IRC channels to the
discussion, because #wikipedia is the big central channel for all the
smaller (language-specific etc) Wikipedia channels, so they too have a
legitimate cause for complaint if #wikipedia is not being run well.
Would you rather I not invite people to give their opinions there??
~Mark Ryan
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l