C.J. Croy wrote:
thought based on what's transcribed so far:
You'd be better off
identifying yourself as from Wikipedia than Wikimedia or Wikinews.
Not many people are as familiar with the subprojects as the core
Wikipedia project. Fox News certainly reporters don't introduce
themselves as employees of NewsCorp.
It brings up a good question: How does the Foundation feel about
people identifying themselves as from Wikipedia, Wikinews, etc? The
Wikipedia brand name is a very strong one and could open a lot of
doors, but if misused could result in a lot of doors being slammed in
our collective face.
Maybe something like "I'm Mr N. Surname from Wikinews, which belongs to
Wikimedia that also owns Wikipedia...." could be the best branding,
although it looks very long to me...
Cruccone