On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:49 PM, geni
<geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2)It's taken years to get the FSF to agree to
let us get around one
set of compatibility problems. Switching to FAL means we may end up in
the same situation with a different organisation
Not to mention the uncertainty that arises from the lack of an
aggregration clause in the FAL.
Bryan
What do you mean by "aggregration clause", I fail to understand ? Could
you tell it with other words, please ?