daniwo59(a)aol.com wrote:
I have a lot of sympathy and fondness for African
languages. However, I
think the attitude we are taking is paternalistic.
Who is? I have not seen this.
The same problems exist for
languages in many other corners of the world. Identifying this issue as uniquely
"African" is paternalistic and, quite frankly, a tad racist. Why do we not
make the same efforts for Khmer (the official language of Cambodia, 66
articles), Burmese (the official language of Myanmar, with 32 million speakers, and
just 66 articles), or Assamese (an official language of India with 20
million speakers and only 6 articles)?
I think we absolutely ARE taking efforts in ALL parts of the world,
simultaneously. I had a meeting in Delhi with someone who is interested
in pursuing a joint project to develop African languages.
I have no idea who you have in mind who thinks anything racist or
paternalistic about African languages, but if they do, then they do not
represent the attitudes of the broad community or me.
--Jimbo
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Jimbo,
If I can help here, let me know. I could generate a machine assisted
translation for them to start with to get them bootstrapped. I posted
what I would
need to get started with it. I know you would prefer people speak with
their own voices, but that me be very hard in the case of some of these
obscure languages where literacy is a big problem or language drift or
small pockets of native speakers who are isolated like small islands in
an ocean of english speakers. I suspect what has been happening to us
with Native Languages is also occurring over their, and many of these
groups may be in danger of loosing their languages already or
experiencing language drift between communities.
I am available to assist here.
Jeff