Perhaps you should work on establishing the Wikimedia brand...
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
2011/1/1 Stephen Bain <stephen.bain(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Erik Moeller
<erik(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
But to suggest that the choice of such
shorthand is tantamount to "lying to and misleading our donors" is,
indeed, irresponsible hyperbole. It's clear that the choice was, in
fact, made to _reduce_ potential confusion of donors about who/what
they're being asked to support.
Hang on:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Philippe Beaudette
<pbeaudette(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> When we get letters saying things like "I'd donate, but only to
Wikipedia, not to Wikimedia", it spells out for us that it's possible we
could attract more people with the institution of Wikipedia than the
institution of Wikimedia.
See the immediately previous sentence in Philippe's email: "Yes, it'll
come as a shock to all of you <tongue-in-cheek> but there are people
who don't know that Wikimedia is anything more than a mis-spelling of
Wikipedia. </tongue-in-cheek>." He's talking about the exact same
issue.
--
Erik Möller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation
Support Free Knowledge:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l