Seriously - why do we have to yoke ourselves to yet another external
organization? Clearly the binding association with the FSF has presented a
number of problems and limitations - wouldn't it be preferable to have
control of the terms, and write in compatibility with the licenses we'd like
to accomodate?
Nathan
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Nikola Smolenski <smolensk(a)eunet.yu> wrote:
> On Tue,
Nov 4, 2008 at 1:49 PM, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2)It's taken years to get the FSF to agree to let us get around one
>> set of compatibility problems. Switching to FAL means we may end up in
>> the same situation with a different organisation
Obvious solution to this problem is the WFDL - Wikimedia Free Document
License!
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l