Anthony wrote:
Your "understanding...that the user in question
did not edit
inappropriately" appears to be incorrect.
I'm referring to the rationale behind the ban (and unless I've missed
something, Ryan hasn't cited past on-wiki issues as a factor).
It appears that the user has not edited Wikipedia in a manner
advocating pedophilia and was not engaged in disruptive editing at the
time of the ban (apart from the belief that editing by a known
pedophile is inherently disruptive).